This is a UK news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Labour news.
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
British defence spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest large defence projects news, cent defence spending news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
defence spendingThe Times & The Sunday Times
•
67% Informative
UK defence source said there was no sign Labour would announce extra money for the armed forces any time soon.
Concerns that the stated ambition to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP would not be achieved until 2030 .
The source said discussion was taking place within government on whether to announce cuts to large defence projects in the autumn.
VR Score
75
Informative language
76
Neutral language
65
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links