Barratt Withdraws Green Belt Applications
This is a news story, published by Building, that relates primarily to Barratt Developments news.
Barratt Developments news
For more Barratt Developments news, you can click here:
more Barratt Developments newsreal estate & housing news
For more real estate & housing news, you can click here:
more real estate & housing newsBuilding news
For more news from Building, you can click here:
more news from BuildingAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like real estate & housing news, you might also like this article about
National Planning Policy Framework proposals. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest affordable housing rule news, Group land director news, real estate & housing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
draft National Planning Policy FrameworkBuilding
•Barratt pulls four planning applications over 50% affordable housing viability concerns
68% Informative
Government plans to increase development on "low quality" green belt land.
National Planning Policy Framework set out several 'golden rules' to ensure public benefits from development.
Barratt Developments group land director Philip Barnes raised concerns about the policy.
He said existing sites within the green belt will not be able to provide 50% affordable housing.
VR Score
72
Informative language
73
Neutral language
49
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links