This is a North Africa news story, published by Live Science.
For more North Africa news, you can click here:
more North Africa newsFor more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsFor more news from Live Science, you can click here:
more news from Live ScienceOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
extinct species. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest lost species news, extinct creature news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
iconic extinct speciesLive Science
•81% Informative
"De-extinction" science has advanced dramatically in the past two decades .
Technology is no longer a significant hurdle to reviving recently extinct species.
Some companies aren't waiting to answer that question.
One company plans to bring back three extinct species: the dodo, the Tasmanian tiger and the woolly mammoth.
The goal of de-extinction is to fill ecological niches that have stood empty since the original species disappeared.
Aurochs, the wild ancestors of domestic cattle, once roamed across North Africa , Asia and nearly all of Europe .
The dodo was one of the largest terrestrial animals in its ecosystem in Mauritius .
The thylacine was Tasmania 's only marsupial apex predator.
"To get some impact, you need to have a lot of animals," an ecologist said.
Reintroductions can lead to clashes between humans and wildlife.
VR Score
91
Informative language
93
Neutral language
75
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
36
Source diversity
19