Supreme Court Limits A.I. Regulation

This is a A.I. news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to John Sutter news.

A.I. news

For more A.I. news, you can click here:

more A.I. news

John Sutter news

For more John Sutter news, you can click here:

more John Sutter news

News about SCOTUS

For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:

more SCOTUS news

Slate Magazine news

For more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:

more news from Slate Magazine

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about

government regulation

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal fishing regulation news, appropriate regulation news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Supreme Court

Slate Magazine

•

Does the First Amendment Protect A.I.? The Supreme Court May Soon Have Its Say.

Summary

Nutrition label

83% Informative

This summer , the Supreme Court issued two decisions that will impact the future of A.I. regulation.

John Sutter : The court's conservative justices want to reduce government regulation of private industry.

He says they may open the door to other kinds of oversight in a pair of other cases, Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice , LLC v. Paxton .

A state law requiring A.I. developers to responsibly collect and take care of training data is unlikely to trigger First Amendment scrutiny.

A law requiring audits and certification of tools that engage in sophisticated persuasion may also not implicate the First Amendment on its face, depending on how it’s written.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful