This is a Cobb news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Katherine Rinderle news.
For more Cobb news, you can click here:
more Cobb newsFor more Katherine Rinderle news, you can click here:
more Katherine Rinderle newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
defendant Cobb county school district. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest school district news, Plaintiffs news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal lawsuitGuardian
•
80% Informative
US Department of Justice , 16 states and D.C. support Georgia school district's motion to dismiss the case.
Plaintiffs include teacher Katherine Rinderle who was fired after reading a book titled My Shadow Is Purple to a fifth -grade class.
16 states, DC and 16 states argue that Cobb county’s “ban of LGBTQ topics in classrooms lacks a legitimate pedagogical purpose, rendering it constitutionally suspect”.
The justice department’s focus on Title IX drilled into plaintiffs’ allegations that Cobb county created a “hostile environment” for students that included discrimination based on sex.
The federal agency also pointed to how the District’s interpretation and enforcement of its Divisive Concepts’ Policies heightened the sex-based hostile environment these students experienced.
This sort of prohibition results in unequal treatment, allege plaintiffs.
VR Score
81
Informative language
78
Neutral language
73
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links