Marmosets Label Monkey Friends
This is a Israel news story, published by MIT Technology Review, that relates primarily to Hebrew University news.
Israel news
For more Israel news, you can click here:
more Israel newsbiology news
For more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsMIT Technology Review news
For more news from MIT Technology Review, you can click here:
more news from MIT Technology ReviewAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
animal names. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest monkeys news, primate language model news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
animal soundsMIT Technology Review
•How machine learning is helping us probe the secret names of animals
77% Informative
A team at Hebrew University in Israel says marmosets "vocally label" their monkey friends with specific sounds.
Marmosets are highly social creatures that maintain contact through high-pitched chirps and twitters called “phee-calls” The names aren’t really recognizable to the human ear; instead, they were identified via a “random forest” technique.
Google DeepMind trained a robot to beat humans at table tennis.
It was able to draw on vast amounts of data to refine its playing style and adjust its tactics as matches progressed.
Its creators hope their work could lead to further research to determine which risks to take more seriously.
VR Score
75
Informative language
72
Neutral language
51
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links