This is a news story, published by Salon, that relates primarily to Biden news.
For more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Salon, you can click here:
more news from SalonOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
sex discrimination. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest transgender students news, latest education regulations news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Parents Defending EducationSalon
•79% Informative
The Supreme Court upheld injunctions on the Biden administration's latest education regulations in 10 states and hundreds of schools and university campuses.
Republican attorneys general and advocacy groups filed lawsuits seeking to block the rollout of new Department of Education regulations.
Those rules lay out how the government enforces Title IX , the 1972 federal civil rights law banning sex discrimination.
Republican AGs and conservative groups argued that the expanded definition of Title IX violates First Amendment rights by chilling speech on issues including gender identity.
The new regulations included a swath of other provisions: providing access to lactation spaces for pregnant students, prohibiting schools from asking about job applicants’ marital status.
The Supreme Court’s two-and-a-quarter page majority ruling upholding the broad injunction on Title IX regulations didn’t provide much insight into the justices’ thinking.
The order said the government failed to convince the court that the lower court was wrong to find the three provisions “are intertwined with and affect other provisions of the rule” A nine -page dissent authored by Justice Sotomayor outlined why the injunction should have been narrowed.
VR Score
80
Informative language
77
Neutral language
68
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links