This is a news story, published by The Nation, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis: Term news.
For more Frida Ghitis: Term news, you can click here:
more Frida Ghitis: Term newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The Nation, you can click here:
more news from The NationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
judicial retirements. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest active federal judges news, federal judges news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
senior judgesThe Nation
•72% Informative
There are currently 870 active federal judges, and 104 of them are eligible to retire, but refuse to do so.
Frida Ghitis: Term limits are popular with the public, but there are constitutional problems with term limits.
She says the Constitution says that federal judges serve for life, but it doesn’t say where they must serve.
Ghitis says senior status limits the lifetime power of federal judges without violating any constitutional principle.
The point of term limits is to take the balance of partisan power in the federal judiciary out of the hands of folks who can’t think of anything better to do in their golden years .
The grim reaper is slowly loosening the iron grip of the baby boomer gerontocracy. The time to reform our system is now.
Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance , and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November .
Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction.
VR Score
74
Informative language
72
Neutral language
16
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links