This is a Hong Kong news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to Chung news.
For more Hong Kong news, you can click here:
more Hong Kong newsFor more Chung news, you can click here:
more Chung newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Hong Kong journalists. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Hong Kong police bounties news, landmark sedition case news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Hong Kong governmentABC News
•
82% Informative
Stand News was one of the last remaining openly critical media outlets in Hong Kong following the shuttering of the Apple Daily newspaper in June 2021 .
The journalists were charged with conspiracy to publish seditious materials under a colonial-era law.
It's Hong Kong's first sedition case involving media since the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 .
If convicted, the defendants could face up to two years in prison and a fine of 5,000 Hong Kong dollars.
Chung , who pleaded not guilty, denied that Stand News was a political platform.
Best Pencil ( Hong Kong) Ltd. , the holding company for Stand News , faces the same charge.
The government lawyers said some of the articles helped promote “illegal ideologies,” as well as smearing the security law.
VR Score
86
Informative language
84
Neutral language
69
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links