This is a Cardona news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Miguel Cardona news.
For more Cardona news, you can click here:
more Cardona newsFor more Miguel Cardona news, you can click here:
more Miguel Cardona newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
House Committee. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Republican representatives Virginia Foxx news, education secretary news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
special counsel Hampton Dellinger TuesdayFox News
•68% Informative
The House Committee on Education and the Workforce is calling for an investigation into whether Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona violated the Hatch Act .
The committee penned a letter to special counsel Hampton Dellinger Tuesday in reference to a July 2024 email from Cardona reportedly sent to "student loan borrowers" The email, reviewed by Fox News Digital , showed Cardona referencing " Republican elected officials" three times as the reason behind roadblocks to the Biden administration's student loan repayment efforts.
The Hatch Act prohibits government officials from using their "official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election".
VR Score
74
Informative language
75
Neutral language
63
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
77
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links