This is a Shaolin news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Wu-Tang Clan news.
For more Shaolin news, you can click here:
more Shaolin newsFor more Wu-Tang Clan news, you can click here:
more Wu-Tang Clan newsFor more music news, you can click here:
more music newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like music news, you might also like this article about
Tang Clan album. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Martin Shkreli news, Shkreli news, music news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Tang ClanArs Technica
•
63% Informative
Wu-Tang Clan album Once Upon a Time in Shaolin had only been produced as a single copy of Martin Shkreli's .
PleasrDAO bought the album for $4.75 million and created a non-fungible token ( NFT ) to show ownership of the album.
But after purchasing the album and sharing the collective ownership of its NFT deed, PleasRDAO discovered that its " one of a kind" object wasn't quite as exclusive as it had thought.
They have asked a federal judge to stop the sale.
A preliminary injunction prevents Shkreli from "possessing, using, disseminating, or selling any interest in the Wu -Tang Clan album " Once Upon a Time in Shaolin " A federal judge in Brooklyn issued a preliminary injunction ( PDF ) in the case as the two parties prepare to battle things out in court.
VR Score
47
Informative language
36
Neutral language
51
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links