This is a Arizona news story, published by PsyPost, that relates primarily to Sleep Health news.
For more Arizona news, you can click here:
more Arizona newsFor more stress and wellness news, you can click here:
more stress and wellness newsFor more news from PsyPost, you can click here:
more news from PsyPostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like stress and wellness news, you might also like this article about
Sleep Health. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest journal Sleep Health news, broader political identities news, stress and wellness news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
political affiliationPsyPost
•78% Informative
A recent study conducted in Arizona reveals that Republicans generally enjoy better sleep than Democrats and Independents .
The researchers used statistical models to analyze the relationship between political affiliation and sleep quality.
The findings were published in the journal Sleep Health .
It remains unclear whether political affiliation directly affects sleep quality directly or if other underlying factors, such as personality traits, play a role.
VR Score
89
Informative language
96
Neutral language
43
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links