UK Strategic Defence Review
This is a UK news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to George Robertson news.
UK news
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsGeorge Robertson news
For more George Robertson news, you can click here:
more George Robertson newsNews about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
defence policy. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest UK defence news, strategic defence review news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
roles UK defenceGuardian
•Experts asked to assess strategic threat to UK as part of defence review
81% Informative
Armed forces, government departments, manufacturers and academics asked to assess the strategic threat to the UK up to 2050 as part of the government’s root-and-branch review of defence policy.
George Robertson , a former Nato secretary general and defence secretary, has written to dozens of interested parties with a 24 -page questionnaire on the future of Britain 's defence.
VR Score
83
Informative language
80
Neutral language
72
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links