This is a Descartes news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to David Rothkopf news.
For more Descartes news, you can click here:
more Descartes newsFor more David Rothkopf news, you can click here:
more David Rothkopf newsFor more disease research news, you can click here:
more disease research newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like disease research news, you might also like this article about
healthy scientific disagreements. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest actual scientific practice news, scientific practice news, disease research news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
legitimate scientific researchPhys Org
•
83% Informative
David Rothkopf : A romanticized picture of science was standard for a long time, but it's as far from actual scientific practice.
He says when the public holds science to unrealistic standards, any claim failing to live up to them arouses suspicion.
While public trust in science is strong globally, it has been eroding, Rothpf says.
He argues that science is a social and contrarian process, where it is almost always for disagreements among experts.
In the 1600s , Descartes and Leibniz fought over how to best characterize the laws of dynamics and the nature of motion.
The nature and structure of fundamental particles and associated fields have been the subject of scientific research for more than a century .
Distrusting researchers for having healthy scientific disagreements is largely misguided.
VR Score
84
Informative language
82
Neutral language
52
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
27
Source diversity
15
Affiliate links
no affiliate links