This is a Reporting news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to Elon Musk news.
For more Reporting news, you can click here:
more Reporting newsFor more Elon Musk news, you can click here:
more Elon Musk newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
lawsuit Musk. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest media policy organization Free Press news, legal war Musk news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
corporate media biasMother Jones
•70% Informative
Lawyers representing Elon Musk and X, formerly known as Twitter , have quietly begun sending subpoenas to a host of public interest groups.
The groups include the Center for Countering Digital Hate , the Union of Concerned Scientists , the digital rights organization Access Now , and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting .
The subpoenas represent a new chapter in the legal war Musk launched after advertisers fled X, and are part of a lawsuit against Media Matters .
“There’s a grim rationality to his legal activities,” says the Center for Countering Digital Hate's founder and CEO, of Musk.
Musk lost a lawsuit that targeted the group in February .
A federal judge ruled that the suit represented a clear effort to “punish” the group for criticizing Twitter .
VR Score
68
Informative language
62
Neutral language
30
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links