Supreme Court Reviews Climate Rules
This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Obama news.
Obama news
For more Obama news, you can click here:
more Obama newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsVerge news
For more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
environmental regulations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest new pollution regulations news, nonprofit environmental law organization Earthjustice news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
environmental advocatesVerge
•SCOTUS could deal another blow to climate action
77% Informative
Environmental Protection Agency finalized rules this year aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants.
But red states and industry groups are challenging the EPA in court and have asked SCOTUS to step in and stop the rules from being implemented.
The request is now in the Supreme Court’s so-called “shadow docket” — meaning SCOTUS can essentially issue a stay on the rules.
The Supreme Court issued a surprise stay on the Obama administration’s attempt at regulating greenhouse gas emissions from power plants in 2016 .
The Obama-era rules never went into effect and were eventually rolled back by the Trump administration.
The groups have since asked the Supreme Court to issue a stay through its emergency — or shadow — docket.
VR Score
77
Informative language
72
Neutral language
58
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
29
Source diversity
17
Affiliate links
no affiliate links