Anti-gerrymandering amendment challenge
This is a Ohio news story, published by Ohio Capital Journal, that relates primarily to LaRose news.
Ohio news
For more Ohio news, you can click here:
more Ohio newsLaRose news
For more LaRose news, you can click here:
more LaRose newsNews about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsOhio Capital Journal news
For more news from Ohio Capital Journal, you can click here:
more news from Ohio Capital JournalAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
unconstitutional ballot language. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest current Ohio Redistricting Commission news, Ohio Constitution news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
redistricting ballot languageOhio Capital Journal
•Anti-gerrymandering amendment supporters sue Ohio Ballot Board over ballot language • Ohio Capital Journal
77% Informative
Supporters of an anti-gerrymandering amendment have asked the Ohio Supreme Court to intervene regarding language the Ohio Ballot Board approved for the November ballot.
A brief filed Monday with the state’s highest court cites constitutional provisions that dictate the way in which titles and language can appear on Ohio ballots.
The board approved the language that will be the summary for the newly minted Issue 1 in a 3 -2 vote.
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights asked the Ohio Supreme Court to order the ballot board to use the full text of the amendment.
The state supreme court faced a similar case in August of last year , when supporters of the reproductive rights amendment on the ballot last November sued to challenge another summary written by LaRose and staffers that they said was deceptive.
VR Score
79
Informative language
76
Neutral language
69
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links