This is a news story, published by Arizona Capitol Times, that relates primarily to Timmer news.
For more Timmer news, you can click here:
more Timmer newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Arizona Capitol Times, you can click here:
more news from Arizona Capitol TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
other justices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court justices news, justices news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Chief Justice Ann Scott TimmerArizona Capitol Times
•
72% Informative
Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer says she knows there’s a good reason she hasn’t recused herself from a case the court is expected to decide this week that could affect whether she and her colleagues must face voters again.
Timmer said any impact on her if the court allows Proposition 137 to go forward is “rather attenuated and speculative” Timmer is not alone in deciding whether what's in the measure referred to the ballot by Republican lawmakers is legal.
Timmer: "If the challengers in that case had prevailed, then the justices, myself included, would have gotten refunded a bunch of money as well as not having to pay as much in future pension contributions" Timmer said she would like to think that she could put her own needs, and the effects of a ruling on the pension changes, aside and simply judge the issue on its merits.
Timmer says she already has enough years on the bench to qualify for the pension.
VR Score
83
Informative language
86
Neutral language
66
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links