This is a news story, published by Australian Science Media Centre, that relates primarily to Digital news.
For more nutrition research news, you can click here:
more nutrition research newsFor more news from Australian Science Media Centre, you can click here:
more news from Australian Science Media CentreOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like nutrition research news, you might also like this article about
online takeaway food sector. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest online food delivery apps news, Digital food delivery apps news, nutrition research news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
food delivery preferencesAustralian Science Media Centre
•81% Informative
Affluent households twice as likely to shop online for groceries as less well off ones.
But households of lower social grade twice as.
likely to opt for take-away meals.
And users of online food delivery apps more likely to be living with obesity.
Digital on-demand technology has.
rapidly and dramatically reshaped food distribution and delivery, making grocery and prepared.
more accessible and convenient.
Digital food delivery apps may also make it easier to make unhealthy food choices, they say, adding: “The differential use of online food delivery services may exacerbate dietary inequalities and warrants further research.” Notes for editors Research: Social inequalities in the use of online food delivery services and associations with weight status: cross-sectional analysis of survey and consumer data Doi: 10.1136 /bmjph-2023-000487 Journal: BMJ Public Health External funding: National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research .
VR Score
92
Informative language
99
Neutral language
52
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links