Republican Veterans Criticize Walz
This is a Afghanistan news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Tim Walz news.
Afghanistan news
For more Afghanistan news, you can click here:
more Afghanistan newsTim Walz news
For more Tim Walz news, you can click here:
more Tim Walz newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
military veterans. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Retired Command Sergeant Major news, US Army staff sergeant news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
former military service membersNew York Post
•50 GOP military vets in Congress denounce Walz for lying about rank, dodging deployment: ‘No honor’
64% Informative
Democratic vice presidential pick Tim Walz lied about his rank in the Army National Guard and leaving before a deployment to Afghanistan to pursue his political aspirations.
The House and Senate GOP lawmakers blasted out an open letter to the Minnesota governor, asking him to correct the “egregious misrepresentations” about his military record.
“There is no honor in lying about the nature of your service,” they wrote.
VR Score
68
Informative language
66
Neutral language
73
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links