This is a Australia news story, published by Nature, that relates primarily to the National Health and Medical Research Council news.
For more Australia news, you can click here:
more Australia newsFor more physics news, you can click here:
more physics newsFor more news from Nature, you can click here:
more news from NatureOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like physics news, you might also like this article about
gender bias. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest researcher quality news, Research funders news, physics news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
researchersNature
•
82% Informative
The more women there are in a field, the lower the overall grant-application success rate and evaluation of researcher quality, according to the latest study.
The study looked at funding data from several organizations spanning tens of thousands of researchers and grant applicants in more than 40 disciplines.
Researchers are divided as to how surprising the latest findings are.
Research funders in Australia have previously made big moves to try to rectify gender bias.
In 2022 , the country’s main health- and medical-research funder, the National Health and Medical Research Council , overhauled its funding process, introducing quotas that specify that half of its grants will go to women.
VR Score
93
Informative language
99
Neutral language
81
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links