This is a U.S. news story, published by The Bulwark, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from The Bulwark, you can click here:
more news from The BulwarkOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
Hacked Trump Documents. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest internal Trump campaign communications news, publication risks news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Trump DocumentsThe Bulwark
•71% Informative
The New York Times , Washington Post and Politico have reportedly received hacked documents from Donald Trump's campaign.
Julian Zelizer : If they decide not to publish the material, it would be a mistake on its face.
Zelizer says it would defy longstanding journalist principles and feed conspiracy theories about pro-Trump media bias.
The idea that there’s nothing “newsworthy” in 271 pages of internal campaign documents at all defies credulity, says Julian Zelizer .
Zelizer: Media organizations don’t want to incentivize hacking political campaigns by providing publicity, or aid a hostile foreign government's efforts to upend U.S. elections.
The New York Times , Politico , and the Washington Post should be transparent about their thinking.
It’s important to start adopting clearer standards, says Julian Zelizer .
Buzzfeed editor Ben Smith said “if I had to do it again, I would publish the dossier” again, although only in excerpts and with more factual context.
VR Score
72
Informative language
67
Neutral language
48
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links