This is a U.S. news story, published by Common Dreams, that relates primarily to Josh Bivens news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Josh Bivens news, you can click here:
more Josh Bivens newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Common Dreams, you can click here:
more news from Common DreamsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Economic Policy Institute. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest policy agenda news, tax proposals news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
conservative policy effortsCommon Dreams
•
81% Informative
Project 2025 would tax employers on workplace benefits that exceed $ 12,000 per worker annually .
EPI Action , a nonpartisan research and advocacy organization, published an analysis of a proposal that appears on page 7 of Project 2025 's section on the Treasury Department .
The policy would be liable to particularly cut into employer-sponsored health insurance, said Josh Bivens , chief economist.
Bivens: The Trump campaign has expressed "enthusiastic approval" of the policy agenda in meetings with the Heritage Foundation .
Trump and his vice presidential candidate, Sen. JD Vance , have attempted to distance themselves from Project 2025 .
The outcome of the plan is clear: " U.S. workers will lose access to key family-sustaining benefits and face higher taxes".
VR Score
84
Informative language
85
Neutral language
36
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links