This is a news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Elissa Slotkin news.
For more Elissa Slotkin news, you can click here:
more Elissa Slotkin newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Washington ExaminerOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
Senate campaigns. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest political campaigns list news, Google Search ads news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeWashington Examiner
•
71% Informative
The campaigns of two Democratic candidates for Senate and the campaign arm of Senate Democrats have used Google Search ads in the past year to manipulate news headlines and article descriptions.
A Washington Examiner analysis of Google’s Ad Transparency Center reveals the campaigns of Reps. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Adam Schiff used the tactic this year against their GOP opponents.
The approach has been used heavily by the campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris , which this month has rewritten the headlines and descriptions within the ad so it appears more favorable to Harris .
VR Score
69
Informative language
65
Neutral language
18
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links