Publishers Sell AI Training Access
This is a news story, published by Nature, that relates primarily to LLM news.
News about Ai research
For more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsNature news
For more news from Nature, you can click here:
more news from NatureAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
AI researcher. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Academic publishers news, publishers news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
scientific publishersNature
•Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly
75% Informative
Academic publishers are selling access to research papers to technology firms to train artificial-intelligence ( AI ) models.
Some researchers have reacted with dismay at such deals happening without consultation of authors.
Experts say that, if a research paper hasn’t yet been used to train a large language model, it probably will be soon.
Even if it were possible to prove that an LLM has been trained on a certain text, it is not clear what happens next.
Publishers maintain that, if developers use copyrighted text in training and have not sought a licence, that counts as infringement.
Many academics are happy to have their work included in LLM training data.
VR Score
86
Informative language
92
Neutral language
44
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links