Koch Network's Super PAC Spending
This is a news story, published by OpenSecrets, that relates primarily to Charles Koch news.
Charles Koch news
For more Charles Koch news, you can click here:
more Charles Koch newsNews about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsOpenSecrets news
For more news from OpenSecrets, you can click here:
more news from OpenSecretsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
Prosperity Action committee. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest hybrid super PAC news, Koch network news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
super PACOpenSecrets
•Koch network’s flagship super PAC pours big money into 2024 elections - OpenSecrets News
80% Informative
Americans for Prosperity has spent over $257 million since 2004 to support conservative congressional and presidential candidates.
Not a single penny has been spent in support of Democrats during the 2024 cycle.
Charles Koch founded the Koch network along with his late brother, David .
The hybrid PAC has received large donations from Stand Together Chamber of Commerce , a dark money group that does not disclose its donors.
Americans for Prosperity argued that the requirement to disclose donors’ donors would abridge their First Amendment rights to “speak anonymously” and “associate freely” The requirement would “driv[e] civil society further into tribalism”.
VR Score
81
Informative language
79
Neutral language
40
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
18
Source diversity
12
Affiliate links
no affiliate links