This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to WHO news.
For more environmental science news, you can click here:
more environmental science newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like environmental science news, you might also like this article about
more regulatory officials. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest new regulations news, environmental officials news, environmental science news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
water guidelinesGuardian
•83% Informative
WHO is conducting an entirely new review of scientific literature and disbanded the panel of scientists who developed the draft guidelines.
The move follows allegations that the process of developing the figures was corrupted by industry-linked researchers.
The WHO said the moves are part of “an ongoing process” and will include guidelines for other PFAS compounds.
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links