This is a Alaska news story, published by U.S. Department of the Interior, that relates primarily to the Land and Water Conservation Fund news.
For more Alaska news, you can click here:
more Alaska newsFor more culture news, you can click here:
more culture newsFor more news from U.S. Department of the Interior, you can click here:
more news from U.S. Department of the InteriorOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like culture news, you might also like this article about
Water Conservation Fund. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal public lands news, Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plans news, culture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Water Conservation Fund ActU.S. Department of the Interior
•
78% Informative
Investment from the Land and Water Conservation Fund is largest in 45 years .
The fund helps strengthen communities, preserve history and protect the national endowment of lands and waters.
Since its inception in 1965 , the fund has funded more than 46,000 projects in every county in the country.
Alabama $ 4,836,940 Alaska $ 2,707,692 Alaska $ 6,721,366 Arkansas $ 3,804,481 California $ 27,358,194 .
Florida $ 15,748,651 Georgia $ 8,319,854 .
Georgia $3.319,060 Illinois $ 10,094,573 .
Texas $ 19,664,051 ; Virginia $ 7,203,951 ; Washington $ 6.896,599 ; Wyoming $2.619,209 District of Columbia .
VR Score
88
Informative language
93
Neutral language
55
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links