This is a news story, published by Uniavisens forside – Uniavisen, that relates primarily to AI news.
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Uniavisens forside – Uniavisen, you can click here:
more news from Uniavisens forside – UniavisenOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI usage. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest ai news, academics news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI revolutionUniavisens forside – Uniavisen
•
64% Informative
University of Copenhagen urged to integrate AI in teaching and daily life.
Author: A future is being substituted for the present, someone’s imagination for reality.
We may lack evidence that AI is a force for good but that doesn’t matter, because opposing its ever-broader deployment is wasted effort.
The university has an obligation to interrogate the proposition that a world in which AI is widely used is desirable or inevitable.
We don’t need to cheer for a vision of tomorrow in which scientists feel comfortable with not personally reading the articles their peers have written and students are not expected to gain insight through wrestling with complex concepts.
VR Score
54
Informative language
47
Neutral language
13
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
12
Source diversity
12
Affiliate links
no affiliate links