This is a California news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Harvard news.
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsFor more environmental science news, you can click here:
more environmental science newsFor more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like environmental science news, you might also like this article about
solar geoengineering. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest significant environmental concerns news, new geoengineering efforts news, environmental science news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Science policy analysisVerge
•83% Informative
Harvard researchers canceled plans to send solar geoengineering particles up into the atmosphere.
A policy analysis published in the journal Science highlights how important it is to talk to people on the ground before launching an experiment.
A big point of contention was that the researchers didn’t initially reach out to the Saami Council .
There has been a moratorium on large-scale geoengineering since 2010 , but it excludes small-scale scientific research.
Last year , the founders of one geoengineering startup grilled fungicide in a California parking lot to produce sulfur dioxide gas that they then attempted to launch into the atmosphere via weather balloons.
There have been calls to either lay down rules for how to regulate future experiments or to stop solar geoengineering altogether.
VR Score
85
Informative language
84
Neutral language
44
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
14
Affiliate links
no affiliate links