Yousaf's Free Prison Phones Cost £6M
This is a news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Humza Yousaf news.
News about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsThe Times & The Sunday Times news
For more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
prison budgets. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest free phones news, prisoners access news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
free personal phonesThe Times & The Sunday Times
•Humza Yousaf’s botched prison phone scheme cost taxpayers £6m
64% Informative
In 2020 , Humza Yousaf , the justice secretary at the time, gave all inmates — including murderers, paedophiles and gangsters — the use of free personal phones in response to the Covid pandemic.
The cost of the mobiles was about 4.1 million and an additional 1.6 million was spent boosting phone signals to give prisoners better reception.
A Scottish Prison Service report said that lessons had been learnt from the botched scheme.
VR Score
68
Informative language
70
Neutral language
14
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links