AI Influences Medical Research
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to explainer news.
explainer news
For more explainer news, you can click here:
more explainer newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
hibernation. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Effective science journalism news, Science Journalists Association news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
draft science explainer articlesGuardian
•Cosmos magazine’s AI-generated articles are bad for trust in science | Jackson Ryan
71% Informative
Last week , it was revealed staff and contributors to Cosmos magazine claim they weren’t consulted about the rollout of explainer articles billed as having been written by generative artificial intelligence.
The controversy has provided a dizzying sense of deja vu.
CSIRO Publishing dismissed concerns that the AI service was trained on contributors’ articles.
But the lack of internal transparency and consultation has left journalists and contributors feeling betrayed and angry.
The backlash has been swift, once again, with journalists weighing in.
If the audience doesn’t want to read AI-generated content, who is it being made for? This is the first question that needs to be answered when rolling out AI .
Only 17% of Australians are comfortable with news produced “mostly by AI ’s” models.
Only 25% of respondents were comfortable with AI being used specifically for science and technology reporting.
VR Score
69
Informative language
66
Neutral language
2
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links