Sir Jim Ratcliffe: London 'Not Safe'
This is a news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Jim Ratcliffe news.
Jim Ratcliffe news
For more Jim Ratcliffe news, you can click here:
more Jim Ratcliffe newsNews about United kingdom business & economics
For more United kingdom business & economics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom business & economics newsTelegraph news
For more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom business & economics, you might also like this article about
Sir Jim Ratcliffe. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest billionaire news, Sir Jim news, news about United kingdom business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
billionaire ownerTelegraph
•London ‘not safe’ any more, says Sir Jim Ratcliffe
70% Informative
Sir Jim Ratcliffe said he no longer wears a watch in the capital for fear of being mugged.
The 71-year-old owner of chemical company Ineos and United is worth an estimated 29.6 billion .
He said a rise in robbery and shoplifting was part of a wider failure by authorities to provide basic public services, including ensuring that there is enough prison space to house criminals.
VR Score
72
Informative language
69
Neutral language
67
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links