Baltimore 'Baby Bonus' Ruled Unconstitutional
This is a news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to John Nugent news.
John Nugent news
For more John Nugent news, you can click here:
more John Nugent newsNews about Us circuit and appeals courts
For more Us circuit and appeals courts news, you can click here:
more Us circuit and appeals courts newsABC News news
For more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us circuit and appeals courts, you might also like this article about
Maryland Child Alliance. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest baby bonus news, Maryland judge news, news about Us circuit and appeals courts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
ballot initiativeABC News
•Judge in Maryland rules Baltimore 'baby bonus' proposal is unconstitutional
80% Informative
Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge John Nugent made the ruling on Friday .
Supporters of the proposal secured the necessary 10,000 signatures to bring the question to voters as a ballot initiative.
Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott had asked to have the ballot question removed from the November ballot.
The Maryland Child Alliance plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Maryland .
VR Score
84
Informative language
83
Neutral language
77
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links