This is a U.S. news story, published by Jacobin, that relates primarily to Paul Heideman news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Paul Heideman news, you can click here:
more Paul Heideman newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from Jacobin, you can click here:
more news from JacobinOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
free abortion. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest low birth rates news, reproductive politics news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
higher birth ratesJacobin
•66% Informative
The U.S. birth rate is now at a record low of 1.64 children per woman, considerably below replacement.
The working class has little political representation, so the costs of bearing and rearing children are largely borne by families.
Paul Heideman argues that the corporate class is unconcerned about the birth rate, but capitalists have a long-term class interest in an increasing US population.
Elizabeth Heideman : Corporate Democrats and many Republicans have settled on immigration as the primary solution to declining birth rates because it’s cheap — they don’t have to contribute money toward raising these workers.
Still, immigrant workers have been powerful constituencies pushing pro-labor victories, she says.
She says contraception, which prevents many more births than abortion, is wildly popular.
The Dobbs decision undermined Supreme Court rulings that forced states to permit contraceptive use among the married and unmarried.
Heideman argues that our corporate overlords are neutral on abortion or may even favor abortion rights.
But this only confirms that capitalists want their own workers to be unencumbered by childbearing, the better to get work out of them.
VR Score
70
Informative language
73
Neutral language
19
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
23
Source diversity
18
Affiliate links
no affiliate links