This is a California news story, published by Time Magazine, that relates primarily to Yoshua Bengio news.
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsFor more Yoshua Bengio news, you can click here:
more Yoshua Bengio newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Time Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Time MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
California AI bill. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI development news, AI developers news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models ActTime Magazine
•
80% Informative
Yoshua Bengio , Geoffrey Hinton , Lawrence Lessig , and Stuart Russell wrote a letter urging key lawmakers to support a California AI bill.
The bill, titled the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act , was introduced by Senator Scott Wiener in February of this year .
If passed, the bill would only apply to systems that cost over $100 million dollars to train and are trained using an amount of computing power above a specified threshold.
Some critics believe the bill would require open-source models to have a “kill switch” “Relative to the scale of risks we are facing, this is a remarkably light-touch piece of legislation,” the authors of the bill say.
“It would be a historic mistake to strike out the basic measures of this bill," Lessig says.
VR Score
77
Informative language
75
Neutral language
32
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
13
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links