NASA Discusses Starliner Reliability
This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Starliner news.
Starliner news
For more Starliner news, you can click here:
more Starliner newsspace exploration news
For more space exploration news, you can click here:
more space exploration newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like space exploration news, you might also like this article about
human spaceflight operations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest NASA officials news, Starliner spacecraft news, space exploration news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
spaceflightArs Technica
•NASA official acknowledges internal “disagreement” on safety of Starliner return
73% Informative
NASA officials for the first time publicly discussed divisions within the agency about whether the Starliner spacecraft is reliable enough to return two veteran astronauts back to Earth from the International Space Station .
The space agency also confirmed that NASA has quietly been working for weeks with SpaceX on a potential recuse mission for Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams .
VR Score
82
Informative language
87
Neutral language
36
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links