This is a Briton news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Neita news.
For more Briton news, you can click here:
more Briton newsFor more Neita news, you can click here:
more Neita newsFor more olympic sports news, you can click here:
more olympic sports newsFor more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like olympic sports news, you might also like this article about
next medal hopes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest medals news, medal news, olympic sports news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Olympic medallistsTelegraph
•
63% Informative
Team GB's Dina Asher-Smith and Daryll Neita finished fourth and fifth in the 200 m.
The British pair were out of the medals by02 and03 seconds respectively.
Gabby Thomas won spectacularly with Julien Alfred not far behind.
Neita briefly looked to be in contention heading into the final 50 m.
Neita was the only Briton to make it into the final of the 100 m, but finished just short of a medal spot.
Asher-Smith and Neita are of course, already Olympic medallists having won bronze in the 4x100 m relay in both 2016 and 2020/1 .
Gabrielle Thomas of the United States and Julien Alfred of St Lucia are the two clear favourites.
VR Score
59
Informative language
54
Neutral language
80
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
26
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links