This is a U.S. news story, published by The Federalist, that relates primarily to Harris news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Harris news, you can click here:
more Harris newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from The Federalist, you can click here:
more news from The FederalistOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
private health coverage. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest current health coverage news, health coverage news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
private insurance coverageThe Federalist
•
54% Informative
Kamala Harris said in January 2019 that she supported a bill banning private health coverage.
Julian Zelizer: Harris ' flip-flops on this issue proved one of the reasons her 2020 presidential campaign cratered so badly.
He says Harris ' plan would largely have the same effects as her initial response to CNN 's Jake Tapper’s question.
Harris has taken just about every type of position on the issue of private coverage in a single-payer program.
But she hasn’t waffled on one issue: She supports full taxpayer-funded benefits for individuals in the U.S. unlawfully.
In taking that position, Harris stands far to the left of 1993-era Hillary Clinton , who testified before Congress .
VR Score
64
Informative language
70
Neutral language
21
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links