This is a news story, published by MSNBC, that relates primarily to Biden news.
For more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSNBC, you can click here:
more news from MSNBCOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court justices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest able justices news, good justices news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
justicesMSNBC
•84% Informative
President Joe Biden announced Monday that a Supreme Court justice’s lifetime tenure needs to end.
Frida Ghitis : Biden 's proposal to institute 18-year term limits for the justices is not the best solution.
She says requiring Supreme Court justices to return to the Senate every decade for a vote would promote much-needed accountability while allowing able justices to continue to serve.
Ghitis says accountability is badly needed now to rein in the current court's aggressive agenda to overturn existing rights.
In recognition of this reality, the makeup of the current court is a campaign issue now. Eighteen years is a long time. Having an opportunity to assess the service of justices at 10-year intervals would allow for earlier retirements for those justices not worthy of staying in office. Both Biden ’s proposal and this one would require a constitutional amendment. Given that arduous path, a remedy that ensures judicial accountability should be preferred..
VR Score
87
Informative language
86
Neutral language
57
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links