This is a Milwaukee news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to RNC news.
For more Milwaukee news, you can click here:
more Milwaukee newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
Milwaukee leaders. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest new Milwaukee development model news, Milwaukee news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
downtown MilwaukeeJournal Sentinel
•83% Informative
It's now clear that the claims of an economic windfall for Milwaukee from the RNC were greatly exaggerated.
The failure to deliver for most small businesses and all but a few service workers points to an even larger and longer-term failure by Milwaukee ’s civic elite.
Until these leaders promote Community Benefits Agreements that guarantee living wages and the right to a union, economic development will be thwarted by the extreme poverty of the working poor.
A union contract channeled some of the convention money into the hands of MASH-represented service workers.
Workers doing the same jobs in the rest of the area got nothing extra from the highly-subsidized RNC .
Milwaukee leaders need to adopt the Deer District model for all future downtown projects.
VR Score
85
Informative language
87
Neutral language
12
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
12
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links