This is a news story, published by The Daily Beast, that relates primarily to Shan Wu news.
For more Shan Wu news, you can click here:
more Shan Wu newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from The Daily Beast, you can click here:
more news from The Daily BeastOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
defendant Trump. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Judge Tanya Chutkan news, former federal prosecutor news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Presidential immunity decisionThe Daily Beast
•69% Informative
Shan Wu and Shan Wu : The case against Donald Trump is back in the hands of a judge who actually knows how to try a criminal case.
They say the Supreme Court shielded Trump and future presidents in near absolute immunity and made the evidentiary process for bringing cases against a President into a legal labyrinth.
Judge Tanya Chutkan , a former public defender, will decide whether the next stage of the case will be an evidentiary hearing that could amount to a mini-trial.
Wu and Wu : A public hearing with witnesses would of course be a great service to the American public.
Some commentators have suggested that President Trump should not have his case tried before the election.
David Gergen says the criticism is wildly misplaced in a case where so much time has already been wasted.
Gergen : The blame for this loss of speed is squarely with the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court .
VR Score
72
Informative language
71
Neutral language
37
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links