This is a U.S. news story, published by Home.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Home, you can click here:
more news from HomeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
polls. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest presidential race news, probability forecasts news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
election coverageHome
•91% Informative
Since 2008 , a new polling tool has gained prominence in the U.S. that suggests which candidate is ahead at any given moment and estimates their probability of winning the eventual election.
The use of such probabilistic forecasts was a constant in coverage of the 2016 presidential race, with an average of 16 mentions per day in cable news broadcasts.
Study: Probabilistic forecasts with higher odds of one candidate winning resulted in people not expending resources necessary to cast a vote in the game.
Study: Being told a candidate’s chance of winning or losing can have a much bigger effect on their propensity to vote than being told how far ahead they are in percentage terms.
VR Score
96
Informative language
97
Neutral language
66
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
19
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links