This is a news story, published by Electronic Frontier Foundation, that relates primarily to The D.C. Court of Appeals news.
For more pets, animals & wildlife news, you can click here:
more pets, animals & wildlife newsFor more news from Electronic Frontier Foundation, you can click here:
more news from Electronic Frontier FoundationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like pets, animals & wildlife news, you might also like this article about
animal rights activists. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest censors Plaintiffs news, PETA activists news, pets, animals & wildlife news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
animal rights advocatesElectronic Frontier Foundation
•
75% Informative
The D.C. Court of Appeals ruled that a federal agency violated the First Amendment .
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) sued the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) in 2021 .
PETA argued that the agency unconstitutionally blocked their comments opposing animal testing in scientific research on the agency's Facebook and Instagram pages.
The D.C. Circuit upheld the First Amendment rights of social media users in this case.
The court acknowledged both points, stating, “The right to praise or criticize governmental agents’ lies at the heart’s protections’ Those in favor of animal testing in scientific research do not typically use words like cruelty, revolting, tormenting, torture, hurt, kill, and stop.
VR Score
76
Informative language
75
Neutral language
11
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
76
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links