Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine
This is a news story, published by SCOTUSblog, that relates primarily to Elena Kagan news.
Elena Kagan news
For more Elena Kagan news, you can click here:
more Elena Kagan newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsSCOTUSblog news
For more news from SCOTUSblog, you can click here:
more news from SCOTUSblogAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
Chevron doctrine. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Chevron deference news, judicial decisions news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Chevron decisionSCOTUSblog
•Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies
83% Informative
By a vote of 6-3 , the justices overruled their 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council .
The decision will likely have far-reaching effects across the country, from environmental regulation to healthcare costs.
Justice Elena Kagan dissented, in an opinion joined by Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson .
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on Monday on when the statute of limitations to challenge agency action begins to run.
Justice Clarence Thomas said the Chevron doctrine was inconsistent not only with the Administrative Procedure Act but also with the Constitution ’s division of power among the three branches of government.
Justice Kagan , who read a summary of her dissent from the bench, was sharply critical of the decision.
Friday ’s ruling came in one of three cases during the 2023-24 term seeking to curtail the power of federal agencies a conservative effort sometimes dubbed the “war on the administrative state” In October , the court heard arguments in a challenge to the constitutionality of the mechanism used to fund the consumer watchdog Consumer Financial Protection Bureau .
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
51
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links