This is a news story, published by Common Dreams, that relates primarily to Inequality news.
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsFor more news from Common Dreams, you can click here:
more news from Common DreamsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
billionaire wealth. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest extreme wealth news, wealthiest people news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Economic inequalityCommon Dreams
•67% Informative
Wealth taxation may sound like a good idea, but can it really address, let alone solve, the problem of inequality? The richest 1 percent gained $42 trillion in new wealth over the past decade , which amounts to “ nearly 34 times more than the entire bottom 50 percent of the world’s population.” Inequality also undermines social mobility, contributes to political polarization and fuels authoritarianism.
We need ways to curb the power of big corporations and their drive to maximize shareholder value at the expense of everything else.
We should also set a cap on extreme wealth. There is no social value for having billionaires. We should abolish the superrich, perhaps an easier task, politically speaking, than finding ways to tax them.
VR Score
67
Informative language
68
Neutral language
33
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
20
Source diversity
18
Affiliate links
no affiliate links