This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Senate news.
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Kids Online Safety Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Online Privacy Protection Act news, teens news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
online harmsVerge
•78% Informative
The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0 ) would impose new responsibilities on tech platforms accessed by minors.
They are the first major internet protections for kids to pass the Senate in over two decades .
KOSA is a rare piece of bipartisan legislation with overwhelming support on both sides of the aisle.
KOSA has been amended in response to concerns about its potential impact on trans health information.
For many teens, the internet becomes a lifeline to a community they may not otherwise have ready access to.
The students were also worried about their ability to share information on social media.
For some teens, their access to information and sharing it are not separate concerns.
KOSA doesn't specify how platforms should mitigate risks of mental health disorders or other harms.
It doesn't prevent them from surfacing either information that teens specifically search for or evidence-backed information meant to combat the harms it contemplates.
Opponents say it could incentivize tech companies to restrict a wide range of posts so as not to risk running afoul of the law.
VR Score
76
Informative language
72
Neutral language
53
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
13
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links