UNESCO Warns of Tower's Future
This is a news story, published by Evening Standard, that relates primarily to Historic England news.
Historic England news
For more Historic England news, you can click here:
more Historic England newsart and culture news
For more art and culture news, you can click here:
more art and culture newsEvening Standard news
For more news from Evening Standard, you can click here:
more news from Evening StandardAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like art and culture news, you might also like this article about
London World Heritage Site. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest tall buildings news, tall building policies news, art and culture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
World Heritage propertyEvening Standard
•Unesco to probe impact of high-rise developments on the Tower of London
81% Informative
UNESCO has requested a State of Conservation report into the Tower of London .
The last time the site was reviewed was in 2014 .
The City Plan 2040 , will act as the Corporation ’s guiding document for developing the Square Mile , with its adoption expected in 2025 .
Historic England warned of “a very serious inherent conflict and incompatibility” between the draft Plan and its target of adding 1.2 million square metres of office floorspace.
VR Score
84
Informative language
84
Neutral language
48
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links