This is a L.A. news story, published by Los Angeles Times, that relates primarily to George Floyd news.
For more L.A. news, you can click here:
more L.A. newsFor more George Floyd news, you can click here:
more George Floyd newsFor more unemployment news, you can click here:
more unemployment newsFor more news from Los Angeles Times, you can click here:
more news from Los Angeles TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like unemployment news, you might also like this article about
Los Angeles Economic Assistance Pilot. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest income pilot programs news, income pilot news, unemployment news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Guaranteed Income ResearchLos Angeles Times
•
85% Informative
Study: L.A. pilot that guaranteed families $ 1,000 a month was overwhelmingly beneficial.
Participants in the program experienced a host of financial benefits, according to the study.
Participants reported a meaningful increase in savings and were more likely to be able to cover a $ 400 emergency.
The program was funded through the city budget and included $11 million that city leaders moved from the Police Department budget in response to nationwide protests after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020 .
Despite the positive research findings, programs like BIG:LEAP have raised concerns among some taxpayer groups.
It's not clear where the next round of funding would come from.
VR Score
90
Informative language
92
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links