This is a news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to Vance news.
For more Vance news, you can click here:
more Vance newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
abortion rights ballot measure. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest abortion access news, abortion rights news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
abortion policyMother Jones
•67% Informative
More than 260 doctors from the Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights signed a letter condemning J.D. Vance's anti-abortion record.
The letter comes as Trump 's campaign has dodged calls to define his stance on abortion.
But there are reasons to believe the GOP would, indeed, try to ban abortion nationwide if Trump is re-elected.
A public condemnation from hundreds of doctors over Vance ’s anti-abortion views comes as poll after poll shows most Americans disapprove of the Dobbs decision and support abortion access in all or most cases.
A spokesperson for Vance told Mother Jones that Kamala Harris has no record to run on except for the failure and destruction of the current Administration .
VR Score
63
Informative language
57
Neutral language
30
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
13
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links